Notable Features |
|
|
Construction waste
reduction program |
|
Use of factory manufactured precast concrete elements |
|
Application of
large panel steel formwork |
|
Use of drywall for
the internal partitions |
|
Use of precast facade |
|
Use of precast
staircase |
|
Use of precast
cooking bench |
|
Use of
prefabricated door sets |
|
Application of ISO
14001:96 |
|
On-site sorting of
waste |
|
Site office
erected with metal panel |
|
Reuse of surplus
steel bars |
|
Reuse of large
panel timber |
|
Reuse of pallets
for supporting blocks |
|
Reuse of concrete
test cubes |
Basic
Information |
|
|
Location: Sau
Mau Ping |
|
Building Type: Residential |
|
Contract Period:
31 July 1998 – 30 October 2000 |
|
Gross
Floor Area: 139,974m2 |
|
Client: The Hong
Kong Housing Authority |
|
Quantity Surveyor: Davis
Langdon & Seah (HK) Ltd. |
|
Main Contractor: Hip
Hing Construction Co. Ltd. |
|
Contract Sum: HK$
687 million |
Overview |
|
The
Sau Mau Ping Estate Redevelopment Phase 5 was a residential building project and
the following major items were executed under this contract: |
|
|
Three Harmony 1 Blocks with 2397
flats |
|
The Blocks
were 40 storey in height |
|
Day nursery on G/F of Block 5 |
|
Kindergarten on G/F of Block 6 |
|
Associated drainage and external
work |
|
|
|
|
Waste Management |
|
|
|
|
Waste
management plan |
|
|
|
For
the purpose of identifying opportunities and achieving
continual improvement on environmental performance through a
systematic approach, Hip Hing Construction Co. Ltd. has
documented and maintained an Environmental Management System
(EMS) conforming to ISO 14001:96 requirements. The Project
Manager would at every 6 months interval review and evaluate
compliance with relevant environmental legislation and
regulations. Issues related to waste management such as
segregation of good and reusable material as well as avoidance
of unnecessary wastage resources are also included in the EMS
manual. |
|
|
|
|
On-site
sorting of waste |
|
|
|
On-site
sorting of construction waste was partially performed.
Distributed Separation was adopted. The waste was
separated at the respective floors and then transported
through refuse chute to the ground floor at the appointed
time. Paper, can but not rubble had been sorted out. Large
panel timber and surplus reinforcement were transported to
ground floor by tower crane. |
|
|
|
|
Material
Control |
|
|
|
Construction waste was
expected to arise from three major causes, namely careless
handling of raw materials, excessive or incorrect mixing of
concrete, damaged or defective precast components. For example, defective
rate of precasting was less than 0.1% according to experience
of the contractor. Timber formwork was also a
waste source but the quantity was reduced. The surplus material
for dry wall was also controlled. Tiling was considered to be
the most waste producing. The wastage was generally 5%, but
with dimension co-ordination and sound waste management, the
wastage could be cut down to 3%. Sanitary fitments were
installed at the later stage to prevent damage by the workers.
|
|
|
|
|
Reusable
materials |
|
|
|
|
Site office erected
with metal panel – it could be erected within two weeks |
|
Large panel timber |
|
Surplus steel bars
were stored for reuse |
|
|
|
|
|
Pallets
for supporting bricks or blocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete
test cube |
|
|
|
It
was used as footing for fencing and then transported to
other site for reuse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact
of Contractor
|
|
|
|
Hip
Hing Construction Co. Ltd. |
|
29/F,
New World Tower, 16-18 Queen's
|
|
Road
Central, Hong Kong
|
|
Tel:
(852) 2525 9251
|
|
Fax:
(852) 2845 9295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wall System |
|
Large panel
construction in the form of wall formwork was used for casting
the structural shear walls. This saved time in erecting,
striking and re-erecting the timber formwork as the steel
formwork was handled as one unit. In addition, the timber
formwork can be reused for a maximum of eight times as
required by The Housing Authority, while the
steel formwork can be used for erecting the whole block.
However, traditional timber formwork was adopted to cast the
floor slabs due to the lack of storage and working
space. |
|
|
|
The
concreting cycle for one floor was 6 days. This was the optimum
speed as the tower crane had been fully occupied for
transportation of materials. This speed was considered to be
the same as the speed using traditional method.
|
|
|
|
Dry Wall |
|
‘YTong’
dry wall system was used to form the partitions of the flat. YTong
Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) is manufactured from sand, lime,
PFA, cement, water and aluminum powder. It is composed of calcium
silicate hydrates and many small pores. The accuracy of YTong size
can easily be controlled because the size of the product will not
vary after casting. Also, the shrinkage of YTong product is small
which is only up to 0.055%. In addition, this product is very light
– the density of which ranges from 400-700kg/m. It can be cut into
different sizes according to dimension requirement by simple
equipment such as hand saw or electric cutter. It has the advantage
of easy assembly or dis-assembly to give a flexible layout to the
flat without any concreting process which will produce waste. |
|
|
Precast
Facade |
|
A
casting yard of 100m by 6m was set up on site. Steel formwork
maneuvered by a traveling crane was used instead of the conventional
plywood forms. The facade formwork was turned face down onto the
ground. The steel window frame together with the reinforcement bars
were fixed in the formwork. Concrete was poured into the formwork and
troweled flat. Simultaneously, concrete cubes were made for strength
testing and strength control. After the concrete had set for 7 days,
the horizontal steel formwork was erected upright. After a further 14
days, the formwork could be demounted. Spatter dash was applied on the
overhang portion where mosaic tiles would be applied and other
portions were left smooth for spray painting. |
|
|
|
The
finished facade was then moved to another area for storage until a
tower crane lifts the facade to erect on the Harmony Block.
Although steel formwork is more expensive than timber formwork, the
steel formwork is more durable than timber formwork. In addition, a
better quality finished facade is achieved by prefabrication on the
ground. Therefore, it is cost effective to use precast facade in
mass production. |
|
Precast
Staircase |
|
Another
interesting feature is the precast staircase which was constructed in
8 risers. The half landing was
casted separately as in-situ part. Due to the smooth surface
quality, no applied finishes would be necessary. A metal nosing
strip was the only thing that was required to finish the stair.
Naturally, construction waste would not arise. |
|
|
|
|
Precast
Cooking Bench |
|
Cooking
benches were also pre-fabricated elements. Bench top was cladded with
1 piece 0.8mm satin finish stainless steel sheet. The bench itself
was of lightweight concrete and supported by 60mm concrete support,
smooth finish and epoxy painted. The stainless steel sink was cast in
lightweight concrete bed, 75mm thick, to afford strength to stand
chopping and cutting. Earthing lugs were designed and built for both
sink and bench. |
|
|
Prefabricated
Door sets |
|
Prefabricated
door frames and doors were used in this project. These door sets saved the temporary timber support for door frame, thus reducing
waste. |
|
|
|
|
|
|